CPSO proposes campus police force

ASPSU Senate expresses concerns

On a dark, rainy Tuesday, the Associated Students of Portland State University senate convened. The hottest topic on the agenda: the Campus Public Safety Office.


Phillip Zerzan, CPSO chief, discusses the importance of having university policemen.

During the meeting, CPSO presented its case to the senate for creating a campus police force, a proposed conversion of some its force to “sworn” police officers who undergo a 16-week police academy training.

While PSU administration shows early support for the idea, the school’s student government has concerns about the program’s potential costs, and arming the officers with guns.

The change would give CPSO officers the same enforcement powers as sworn police, beefing up the current enforcement model, which CPSO says is inadequate.


Michael Collins, an APSU senator, discusses concerns student grovernment has about proposed changes to campus security.

Currently, CPSO operates with 14 officers, the same number it has had since 1974. CPSO Chief Phillip Zerzan said the current demands on his staff can, at times, outweigh their abilities. There are large gaps in police services that CPSO needs the Portland Police Bureau to fill—including serving warrants, mental health holds and community caretaking.

For the 29,000 students at PSU, PPB only has two officers assigned to cover the campus, Zerzan said.

Zerzan argued that the function of campus safety is fundamentally different than a police response, but that currently, his officers are lacking the authority to respond to all types of situations. With a campus police force, he argued, PSU could have a more sensitive response.

He described a situation where one of his officers spent two hours with a student who had a history of mental health problems. The officer helped the student navigate the paperwork and structure of the Center for Student Health and Counseling to get the help that they needed.

“The cops wouldn’t do that,” he said.

Monica Rimai, vice president of the Office of Finance and Administration was on hand to make comments. She echoed Zerzan’s sentiment that officers’ functions could be expanded with more authority.

“Campus safety is somewhere between a police officer, and a social worker,” she said.

Rimai’s office, which oversees CPSO, would like to be able to make a recommendation for action by the end of the year, although there are no official deadlines.

“It’s the start of a conversation,” she said, “and that’s all it really is.”

Rimai said most people would like a safer campus.

“But what we don’t agree on, is how we get there,” she said.

Previously, there has been apprehension among members of ASPSU regarding the proposed changes, particularly centered around the issue of whether CPSO officers will be carrying guns.

When posed the question of whether he supported having his force armed, Zerzan replied: “I favor a police department. Police officers in Oregon are armed.”

ASPSU President Tiffany Dollar raised two concerns. She voiced the apprehension that working for a campus police department may not be the most desirable job for candidates fresh out of the police academy, and that PSU may have inferior officers compared with traditional police bureaus.

Zerzan replied that when he began as head of the Oregon State University campus police force in 2002, turnover was high. However, by the time he left his position in 2007, there were no transfer requests because of adjustments he had made. He did acknowledge, however, that there will be some movement among the force.

“It can be a good place for rookie cops to start,” he admitted.

Dollar was also concerned that increasing the authority and scope of the force would be expensive. “Students pay 80 percent of the operating cost of the university,” she said. She was concerned how the changes would affect tuition. Zerzan was unclear about the exact cost of the changes, estimating that it might raise the annual operating cost of his department by roughly two million dollars, from the current $1.9 million cost.

According to Zerzan, the changes to CPSO already have the support of the Women’s Resource Center and PSU’s Counseling and Psychological Services.

He stated that if it were up to him, the changes would happen tomorrow, but more realistically, “This will take years,” Zerzan said. “Universities move very slow.”

Currently, the university affairs committee of ASPSU will begin investigating the issue, and ASPSU has previously stated that it has plans to poll the student body for opinions.


  1. NO NO NO to campus cops. We are located in a city with TOO MANY trigger happy police officers already. DO NOT add more at our expense!

  2. I would like to discuss having CPSO changing from a security force to a police force, and arming them as well. The argument has been made that there are gaps in areas that the police can patrol, and when they can be available. Before making the argument to arm security officers with firearms, I would need to be convinced that arming our campus security would provide safety for the students. The Clery report, which all post-secondary school in the country has to file yearly, is part of helping the student body be aware of the possible dangers attending their institution. Looking at the report for the years 2009-2011 I see when it comes to danger is that the biggest threat to students on campus is liquor law referrals which has steadily decreased from 2009 which it was 250 referrals that year to 2011 which was 136. There have been an increase of sexual assaults since 09, but looking over the report with 0 murders, 0 manslaughters, 0 aggravated assaults in 2011, and the risk being more from burglary and theft. How is it justified equipping junior officers with weapons? If it is to protect me as a student, I would feel safer knowing that these junior officers are not armed, but simply there as support. There have been too many cases of accidental shootings to justify arming our campus security that may grab their gun instead of trying to talk through the situation first.

  3. How about PSU stops violating our constitutional rights and allows students over 21 with a valid concealed carry permit to carry. Allow us to take our safety into our own hands. The police and CPSO cannot be everywhere at once. Do research on it, concealed carry drops violent crime rates and CPL holders are 8 times less likely to commit any kind of crime than your average citizen. Stop disarming law abiding citizens and turning us into victims.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here